<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Byteat &#124; Technology news &#187; computer components</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.byteat.net/category/computer-components/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.byteat.net</link>
	<description>Technology News and reviews of the latest tech, laptops, mobiles, computer, systems, programs, software, cars, gadgets and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2011 19:31:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>ASUS ARES: The world&#8217;s fastest graphics card</title>
		<link>http://www.byteat.net/2010/07/08/asus-ares-the-worlds-fastest-graphics-card/</link>
		<comments>http://www.byteat.net/2010/07/08/asus-ares-the-worlds-fastest-graphics-card/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 12:28:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[computer components]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[5870]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMD crossfire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AmdCrossfire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ARES]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASUS ARES]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AsusAres]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ati]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ATI crossifre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ati radeon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ATI Radeon HD 5870]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AtiCrossifre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AtiRadeon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AtiRadeonHd5870]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benchmark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benchmarked]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benchmarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crossfire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gpu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Graphics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[graphics card]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[graphics cards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GraphicsCard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GraphicsCards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Radeon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radeon hd 5870]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RadeonHd5870]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review roundup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ReviewRoundup]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.byteat.net/?p=1688</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When you name your graphics card after the God of War, you&#8217;d better hope it brings some heat, but judging by early reviews, that&#8217;s just what ASUS has done. The three slot monstrosity above is the ARES, a $1200 limited edition, fully custom board, sporting twin Radeon HD 5870 GPUs, four gigabytes of GDDR5 memory [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_1687" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 410px"><a rel="attachment wp-att-1687" href="http://www.byteat.net/2010/07/08/asus-ares-the-worlds-fastest-graphics-card/asus-ares/"><img class="size-medium wp-image-1687" title="Asus-ares" src="http://www.byteat.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/Asus-ares-400x245.jpg" alt="Asus-ares" width="400" height="245" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Asus ares</p></div>
<p>When you name your graphics card after the God of War, you&#8217;d better hope it brings some heat, but judging by early reviews, that&#8217;s just what ASUS has done. The three slot monstrosity above is the ARES, a $1200 limited edition, fully custom board, sporting twin Radeon HD 5870 GPUs, four gigabytes of GDDR5 memory and practically enough raw copper to smelt a sword. <span id="more-1688"></span>We&#8217;re not joking: the thing weighs nearly five pounds and requires a 750 watt power supply with three power connectors (two 8-pin, one 6-pin) to even run. Of course, you&#8217;re getting a graphical behemoth for that kind of price, steamrolling every other GPU on the planet &#8212; paired with even a 3.8GHz Core i7-930 CPU in 3DMark Vantage (on Extreme settings), Overclock 3D racked up a fairly ludicrous 15,000 score, and the card ripped past 25,000 with a Core i7-980X and a second ARES in CrossFire. The card was less impressive in actual gameplay, merely spanking the (much cheaper) Radeon 5970 and GeForce GTX 480 by a modest amount, and several reviewers complained it was fairly loud&#8230; but as the old adage goes, nobody needs a Ferrari to drive the speed limit, but we&#8217;ll all drool over them anyhow. Bring on the liquid nitrogen, folks.</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/08/asus-ares-cries-havoc-lets-slip-the-gpus-of-war-a-review-round/" target="_blank">Engadget</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.byteat.net/2010/07/08/asus-ares-the-worlds-fastest-graphics-card/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>eMachines Mini-e ER1402: New look</title>
		<link>http://www.byteat.net/2010/06/26/emachines-mini-e-er1402-new-look/</link>
		<comments>http://www.byteat.net/2010/06/26/emachines-mini-e-er1402-new-look/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jun 2010 14:05:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[computer components]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[athlon ii]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AthlonIi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Desktop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emachines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ER1402]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mini-e]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mini-e ER1402]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mini-eEr1402]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nvidia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sff desktop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sff pc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SffDesktop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SffPc]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.byteat.net/?p=1644</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We&#8217;re guessing that you may actually save even more space if you take the Mini-e from atop that stand and actually let it lay flat on your desk, but it sure looks cute, don&#8217;t it? eMachines latest, um, machine  &#8220;looks more like modern art than a computer,&#8221; or at least that&#8217;s what we&#8217;re being told [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_1643" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 356px"><a rel="attachment wp-att-1643" href="http://www.byteat.net/2010/06/26/emachines-mini-e-er1402-new-look/emachine_e1402/"><img class="size-medium wp-image-1643" title="emachine_e1402" src="http://www.byteat.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/emachine_e1402-346x320.jpg" alt="emachine_e1402" width="346" height="320" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">emachine e1402</p></div>
<p>We&#8217;re guessing that you may actually save even more space if you take the Mini-e from atop that stand and actually let it lay flat on your desk, but it sure looks cute, don&#8217;t it? eMachines latest, um, machine  &#8220;looks more like modern art than a computer,&#8221; or at least that&#8217;s what we&#8217;re being told in the presser hosted up just past the break. The Mini-e ER1402 measures just 7.1 inches in diameter and weighs 9 pounds, and while it won&#8217;t handle the latest installment of Crysis, it should plow through those late night Hulu catch-up sessions with ease. Touting an AMD Athlon II Neo CPU, NVIDIA&#8217;s GeForce 9200 GPU, 2GB of RAM, four USB 2.0 ports, a built-in card reader, 160GB hard drive, 802.11b/g/n WiFi and an HDMI port, this SFF PC can also be mounted upside your wall or closet if you so choose. Best of all? That totally reasonable $299.99 price tag, coupled with an availability of status of &#8220;right now, compadre.&#8221;</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/26/emachines-mini-e-er1402-all-the-pc-your-mother-can-handle-for/" target="_blank">Engadget</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.byteat.net/2010/06/26/emachines-mini-e-er1402-new-look/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mac mini review (mid 2010) :</title>
		<link>http://www.byteat.net/2010/06/19/mac-mini-review-mid-2010/</link>
		<comments>http://www.byteat.net/2010/06/19/mac-mini-review-mid-2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jun 2010 14:00:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[computer components]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Audio MIDI Setup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blu-ray drive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[boxee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[desktops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HD Set Tops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HDMI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hdtv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[htpc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mac mini]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MacMini]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MKV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nettops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nvidia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Perian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VLC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.byteat.net/?p=1608</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Mac mini has long been the oddball child of the Mac family: it&#8217;s the only consumer-level machine from Apple that isn&#8217;t a fully-integrated experience, and it&#8217;s the only Mac to have had a sub-$1,000 sticker price in some time. But people love this little weirdo, and they love to do weirdly awesome things with [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_1609" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 410px"><a rel="attachment wp-att-1609" href="http://www.byteat.net/2010/06/19/mac-mini-review-mid-2010/mac-mini/"><img class="size-medium wp-image-1609" title="Mac-mini" src="http://www.byteat.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/Mac-mini-400x266.jpg" alt="Mac-mini" width="400" height="266" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Mac mini</p></div>
<p>The Mac mini has long  been the oddball child of the Mac family: it&#8217;s the only consumer-level  machine from Apple that isn&#8217;t a fully-integrated experience, and it&#8217;s  the only Mac to have had a sub-$1,000 sticker price in some time. But  people love this little weirdo, and they love to do weirdly awesome  things with it &#8212; we&#8217;ve seen Mac minis stuffed into everything from old G4  Cube shells to volleyball-playing  robots to pianos to&#8230; DeLoreans.  Yes, DeLoreans. <span id="more-1608"></span>And, of course, people have longed been connecting Mac  minis to HDTVs and using &#8216;em as a media players &#8212; it&#8217;s small, quiet,  relatively powerful, and it&#8217;s a real computer, so it can play virtually  any video file you throw at it. And now it&#8217;s gotten even more attractive  as a home theater PC, since Apple&#8217;s given the newest  Mac mini a striking unibody makeover, NVIDIA GeForce 320M graphics,  and &#8212; a first for any Mac &#8212; an HDMI port, making it a dead-simple  addition to your HDTV. On the flip side, the base price of the only  stock consumer configuration has gone up to $699, and to be blunt, much  cheaper PCs have had HDMI ports forever. So is the mini worth the  premium? Is it the ultimate small PC for the living room &#8212; and beyond?  Read on to find out.</p>
<div>
<div>Mac  mini (unibody) unboxing and hands-on</div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/06/newminiunb1_103x88.jpg" alt="" /><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/06/newminiunb2_103x88.jpg" alt="" /><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/06/newminiunb5_103x88.jpg" alt="" /><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/06/newminiunb3_103x88.jpg" alt="" /><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/06/newminiunb4_103x88.jpg" alt="" /></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<h6>Hardware</h6>
<div>
<img id="vimage_3097295" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/06/2010-06-18mini-8-1276904292.jpg" border="1" alt="" hspace="4" vspace="4" /></div>
<p>The new mini represents the first major redesign in the product&#8217;s  history since it was first introduced in 2005. That&#8217;s partially a  testament to the minimalist good looks of the previous design, of course  &#8212; it&#8217;s managed to blend in with every Apple design trend of the past  five years. By the same token, the new design promises to have equal  staying power: it&#8217;s at once both simpler and more deeply considered.  Obviously the major portion of the case is the aluminum unibody, which  is thinner than the previous-gen at an inch and a quarter, but slightly  bigger around at seven by seven inches square. Apple tells us the new  and old minis are essentially the same size by volume; you might think  of the new mini as being a flattened-out version of the old. In fact,  the new mini looks like nothing so much as the Apple TV &#8212; but we&#8217;ll get  to the heart of that comparison later.</p>
<div>
<div>Mac  Mini vs. Apple TV&#8230; fight!</div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/06/2010-06-18minivsatv-3_103x88.jpg" alt="" /> <img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/06/2010-06-18minivsatv-2_103x88.jpg" alt="" /><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/06/2010-06-18minivsatv-1_103x88.jpg" alt="" /><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/06/2010-06-18minivsatv_103x88.jpg" alt="" /></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p>The new mini doesn&#8217;t actually sit flat on a surface &#8212; it actually rises  up off the ground by a few millimeters on a circular pedestal. This is  for two reasons: the front lip houses an air intake, which is vented out  the back, and it also creatively conceals a WiFi antenna, which would  otherwise be stifled by that all-aluminum enclosure. Bluetooth and a  second matching WiFi antenna are also located on the plastic back panel  for 360-degree coverage. We tried the mini all over the house on our  5GHz WiFi network and suffered zero problems, so it seems like this  little trick was effective for us &#8212; we&#8217;ll see how others with larger or  more complex WiFi setups fare.</p>
<div><img id="vimage_3097303" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/06/2010-06-18mini-9.jpg" border="1" alt="" hspace="4" vspace="4" /></div>
<p>About that pedestal: as you might have noticed from our hands-on  photos, flipping the mini over reveals a circular access door,  which you can twist off to get at the RAM. It&#8217;s hard not to marvel at  the sheer Apple-ness of the panel the first time you interact with it &#8212;  other companies simply don&#8217;t make computers like this. Unfortunately,  you can&#8217;t get at anything other than the RAM once the panel is off, as  the hard drive isn&#8217;t user replaceable. That&#8217;s pretty silly, in our  opinion: hard drives have a nasty habit of failing, especially when you  run &#8216;em non-stop in servers and video playback machines, and we&#8217;d much  rather have a hard time upgrading the RAM once at the outset than feel  helpless about replacing a glitchy hard drive.</p>
<div><img id="vimage_3097273" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/06/2010-06-18mini-2.jpg" border="1" alt="" hspace="4" vspace="4" /></div>
<p>Round back there&#8217;s a pretty standard array of ports: three USB, FireWire  800, gigabit Ethernet, an SDXC card slot, mini DisplayPort, HDMI, mic  in, and audio out, which supports optical out as well. Apple says the  idea is for the mini to be able to plug into most everything out of the  box, so there&#8217;s an HDMI-to-DVI adapter packed in the box, and you can  obviously score a VGA mini DisplayPort adapter as well. The HDMI port  itself is said to be &#8220;HDMI 1.3-compliant,&#8221; and it&#8217;ll carry up to eight  channels of audio and run displays up to 1920 x 1200, although it  doesn&#8217;t support the little-used Deep Color. As with the previous mini,  you can use both display outputs simultaneously; the mini DisplayPort  supports a max res of 2560 x 1600. Oh, and this is the first time  Apple&#8217;s done an SDXC slot, so that&#8217;s nice &#8212; expect to see that on other  SD-equipped Macs as time goes on.</p>
<p>Inside, the mini is very similar to the $999 MacBook: our tester was the  lone standard configuration, with a 2.4GHz Core 2 Duo, an NVIDIA  GeForce 320M GPU, 2GB of RAM, and a 320GB hard drive. It&#8217;s not a ton of  computer for $699 &#8212; you can get any number of Core i5 PC towers with  similar GPUs for the same money &#8212; but as usual, that&#8217;s not really what  Apple&#8217;s going for, and what you lose in raw computing power you gain in  saved <em>power</em> power, as the mini draws less than 10 watts of  power at idle, lower than almost every other competitive machine. What&#8217;s  more, the new 85-watt power supply is now built right in, so there&#8217;s no  power brick, which is quite nice, especially for home theater and other  nonstandard installations. (In fact, the power plug is the same as the  Apple TV, so you can swap in the mini right in place.)</p>
<p>The mini is also exceptionally quiet: we never heard the fan kick in,  even while we played games or watched videos. That&#8217;s not to say the fan  wasn&#8217;t going, but just that we never heard it. Given our recent  experiences with incredibly obnoxious MacBook Pro fans, we&#8217;re marking  that in the plus column. The mini was also laudably cool &#8212; we never  felt it get even slightly warm after a full day of testing.</p>
<p>Of course, there&#8217;s one very notable hardware omission here: a Blu-ray  drive. It&#8217;s sort of amazing that Apple will happily sell you a $700  computer with an HDMI port that doesn&#8217;t support the best, easiest and  highest-quality consumer HD playback format available, but for whatever  reason the company just doesn&#8217;t offer any machines that do Blu-ray, even  though it&#8217;s a member of the Blu-ray Disc Association. When we pressed  them about it, Apple told us they just don&#8217;t see customer demand for BD  drives because the format has yet to take off. We obviously disagree,  but that&#8217;s the final answer &#8212; maybe the mini&#8217;s newfound affinity for  HDTVs will finally push Apple to offer Blu-ray in the future.</p>
<h6>Performance</h6>
<p>At this point the performance characteristics of a 2.4GHz Core 2 Duo Mac  with a 1066MHz bus are pretty familiar territory; Apple&#8217;s had similar  basic hardware in its lineup since  2008. The new mini adds the NVIDIA GeForce 320M graphics processor  to the mix, which is a more potent successor to the familiar 9400m from  the previous model &#8212; it&#8217;s still integrated graphics, but it&#8217;s  reasonably fast integrated graphics.</p>
<p>Needless to say, the new Mac mini was more than capable of basic tasks  like browsing, word processing, and running iTunes. And unlike the Atom-  or Ion-based nettops you might consider putting under your TV, the mini  is also more than capable of running HD Flash video without any  hesitation &#8212; and it&#8217;ll be even better when Flash  10.1 &#8220;Gala&#8221; ships with hardware video acceleration for Mac OS X.  The mini can also play virtually every other video file you might throw  at it using either QuickTime with the open-source Perian component or  other popular video apps like VLC or Movist, which is our new favorite.  We didn&#8217;t have any issues playing 1080p files from a variety of sources,  and we wouldn&#8217;t have any hesitation doing a little light iMovie work on  the side. On the straight benchmark front, the mini put up a Geekbench  score of 3385, which is right in line with what we&#8217;d expect.</p>
<p>Where the mini does struggle is gaming performance. Although the GeForce  320M can handle less taxing games and lower resolutions just fine, it  can&#8217;t hang once you crank things up &#8212; we averaged between 17-20fps  running Portal at 1920 x 1200 with the default settings, and about the  same when we ran it at 1080p connected to our TV. If you&#8217;re willing to  step it down, though, you should be fine &#8212; we got 30fps running  Half-Life 2 Episode 2 at 1280 x 800. Passable, but if you&#8217;re a hardcore  gamer you&#8217;re probably not looking at Macs anyway.</p>
<h6>In the living room</h6>
<div><img id="vimage_3097296" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/06/2010-06-18mini-6-1276904316.jpg" border="1" alt="" hspace="4" vspace="4" /></div>
<p>So this is where it gets interesting &#8212; people have been using the Mac  mini as a basic HTPC for years now, and the new model&#8217;s HDMI port  certainly makes it seem like Apple&#8217;s given the little guy its blessing  to invade the living room. It&#8217;s not quite that simple, though &#8212; and if  you were hoping to just drop in the new mini in place of an aging Apple  TV, well, you&#8217;ve got some surprises coming. First, you should note that  all the HDMI port really gets you is a simpler interconnect story;  otherwise you&#8217;re still dealing with a full-on computer, not an  integrated media device. Second, the fact that you&#8217;re using a real  computer means that you need some sort of keyboard and mouse to do  anything of value &#8212; sure, you can click through Front Row using an  Apple Remote, but that&#8217;s a pretty limited experience compared to even  the Apple TV, and you didn&#8217;t just pay $700 for a limited experience.  Apple was pretty upfront about this: they told us that the mini&#8217;s HDMI  port is about offering flexibility, not making a play in the living  room, and that mini customers who wanted to hook it up to a TV were  probably savvy enough to find their own software and input methods. In  fact, the only HDTV-specific piece of software on the mini is a new  underscan slider in the Displays preference pane, which lets you dial in  the size of the image on your TV. Apart from that, you&#8217;re on your own  here, Chico.</p>
<div><img id="vimage_3097280" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/06/2010-06-18mini-4.jpg" border="0" alt="" hspace="4" vspace="4" /></div>
<p>That said, the mini is a capable little HTPC once you get it set up and  going with the software of your choice: we obviously tried out Front Row  and Boxee, which both worked flawlessly, and we had no problem playing  back a 1080p MKV over HDMI once we installed Perian. Since the mini can  output up to eight audio channels over HDMI, it&#8217;s technically possible  to run a full 7.1 surround system from it, but getting <span style="text-decoration: line-through;">DTS audio  output in OS X from anything other than a DVD is seemingly impossible,  so if you&#8217;re a stickler you should be transcoding to AC-3 surround and  sending that to your receiver.</span> Like we said, you can&#8217;t just  hook this up to a TV and go &#8212; you&#8217;ve got to baby it a little if you  want the best experience. Of course, all this would be a lot easier if  Apple would just offer a Blu-ray drive, but we digress.</p>
<p><strong>Update:</strong> Turns out VLC will send encoded DTS output over  HDMI, but you have to specifically tell it to do so under the audio  menu. Huzzah!</p>
<p>That&#8217;s really the only hardcore home theater testing we did &#8212; other,  simpler things like playing back Netflix and Hulu obviously work just as  well as they do on any other Mac, and you won&#8217;t run into any problems.  Of course, you can also purchase or rent movies and TV shows from the  iTunes Store; we didn&#8217;t run into any problems doing that, obviously.</p>
<div><img id="vimage_3097281" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/06/2010-06-18mini-3.jpg" border="0" alt="" hspace="4" vspace="4" /></div>
<p>And that&#8217;s really it &#8212; the Mac mini is just a Mac, albeit one that&#8217;s  really easy to hook up to your TV. If you want to take the leap into  having a full-on computer in your living room, it&#8217;s a fine way to start,  since it&#8217;s small, quiet, cool, and fast. Just know that getting the  best experience isn&#8217;t necessarily plug and play &#8212; unless you&#8217;re willing  to spend some time monkeying around with semi-obscure utilities like  Audio MIDI Setup, putting a mini under your TV might cause more problems  than it solves.</p>
<h6>Wrap-up</h6>
<div><img id="vimage_3097297" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/06/2010-06-18mini-7.jpg" border="1" alt="" hspace="4" vspace="4" /></div>
<p>Apple tells us its goal with the Mac mini was to make a small, flexible  computer that would fit into whatever environment people wanted it to go  &#8212; the company seems quite chuffed with the number of people who put  minis into cars, for example. By that measure, the new Mac mini is a  raging success &#8212; it&#8217;s one of the most perfectly-executed small PCs  we&#8217;ve ever encountered, and it can indeed hook up to almost anything and  accomplish nearly any task. If you&#8217;ve got $700 and you need a small  Mac, you&#8217;re going to be pretty happy with a Mac mini.</p>
<p>On the other hand, $700 ain&#8217;t cheap. You&#8217;ll almost certainly get more  bang for those bucks in the PC world, although you&#8217;ll sacrifice some fit  and finish. It&#8217;s also fairly easy to find a $700 HDMI-equipped PC with a  Blu-ray drive, which is a striking omission from the mini &#8212; especially  since it seems so perfectly suited to the living room. No, the mini  isn&#8217;t the perfect HTPC, although it&#8217;s close. But if you can live without  Blu-ray and you can afford the price tag, the mini promises to be just  as lovable an oddball as its predecessor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.byteat.net/2010/06/19/mac-mini-review-mid-2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sony VAIO J touchscreen all-in-one</title>
		<link>http://www.byteat.net/2010/06/08/sony-vaio-j-touchscreen-all-in-one/</link>
		<comments>http://www.byteat.net/2010/06/08/sony-vaio-j-touchscreen-all-in-one/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 13:54:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[computer components]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[all in one pc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All-in-One]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All-in-onePc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[core 2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[core i7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[core i7-620m]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Core2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CoreI7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CoreI7-620m]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intel core 2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel Core i7 - 620M]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IntelCore2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IntelCoreI7-620m]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sony vaio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony VAIO J]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SonyVaio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SonyVaioJ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VAIO J]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VaioJ]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.byteat.net/?p=1502</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On the surface it doesn&#8217;t look like much separates Sony&#8217;s new 21.5-inch VAIO J all-in-one from the growing number of touchscreen AIOs on the market, but it&#8217;s definitely one of the more head-turning options out there. Like its 24-inch L Series, the VAIO J has a 1920&#215;1080-resolution display and a Blu-ray drive, but the larger [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_1501" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 410px"><a href="http://www.byteat.net/?attachment_id=1501"><img class="size-medium wp-image-1501" title="Sony Vaio J lead" src="http://www.byteat.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/Sony-Vaio-J-lead1-400x289.jpg" alt="Sony VAIO J  touchscreen all-in-one " width="400" height="289" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Sony VAIO J all-in-one </p></div>
<p>On the surface it doesn&#8217;t look like much separates Sony&#8217;s new 21.5-inch VAIO J all-in-one from the growing number of touchscreen AIOs on the market, but it&#8217;s definitely one of the more head-turning options out there. Like its 24-inch L Series, the VAIO J has a 1920&#215;1080-resolution display and a Blu-ray drive, but the larger model now packs a 2.66GHz Intel Core i7-620M CPU, up to 8GB of RAM, and NVIDIA discrete graphics options with 512 vRAM. <span id="more-1502"></span>It also has a 7,200rpm 500GB hard drive and boots Windows 7 Premium, though Sony has added its touch-friendly Media Gallery software layer. The best news? While the L starts at $1,300, the J will arrive next month with a $900 starting price. Sure, there are cheaper models out there, but when doesn&#8217;t Sony demand a few extra bucks for its good looks? On that note, we&#8217;ll leave you with some polished press shots and the full PR after the break.</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/08/sony-vaio-j-joins-the-touchscreen-all-in-one-ranks/" target="_blank">Engadget</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.byteat.net/2010/06/08/sony-vaio-j-touchscreen-all-in-one/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

